(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime)
| 17503 | } |
| 17504 | |
| 17505 | function reconcileChildrenArray(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime) { |
| 17506 | // This algorithm can't optimize by searching from both ends since we |
| 17507 | // don't have backpointers on fibers. I'm trying to see how far we can get |
| 17508 | // with that model. If it ends up not being worth the tradeoffs, we can |
| 17509 | // add it later. |
| 17510 | // Even with a two ended optimization, we'd want to optimize for the case |
| 17511 | // where there are few changes and brute force the comparison instead of |
| 17512 | // going for the Map. It'd like to explore hitting that path first in |
| 17513 | // forward-only mode and only go for the Map once we notice that we need |
| 17514 | // lots of look ahead. This doesn't handle reversal as well as two ended |
| 17515 | // search but that's unusual. Besides, for the two ended optimization to |
| 17516 | // work on Iterables, we'd need to copy the whole set. |
| 17517 | // In this first iteration, we'll just live with hitting the bad case |
| 17518 | // (adding everything to a Map) in for every insert/move. |
| 17519 | // If you change this code, also update reconcileChildrenIterator() which |
| 17520 | // uses the same algorithm. |
| 17521 | { |
| 17522 | // First, validate keys. |
| 17523 | var knownKeys = null; |
| 17524 | |
| 17525 | for (var i = 0; i < newChildren.length; i++) { |
| 17526 | var child = newChildren[i]; |
| 17527 | knownKeys = warnOnInvalidKey(child, knownKeys); |
| 17528 | } |
| 17529 | } |
| 17530 | |
| 17531 | var resultingFirstChild = null; |
| 17532 | var previousNewFiber = null; |
| 17533 | var oldFiber = currentFirstChild; |
| 17534 | var lastPlacedIndex = 0; |
| 17535 | var newIdx = 0; |
| 17536 | var nextOldFiber = null; |
| 17537 | |
| 17538 | for (; oldFiber !== null && newIdx < newChildren.length; newIdx++) { |
| 17539 | if (oldFiber.index > newIdx) { |
| 17540 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber; |
| 17541 | oldFiber = null; |
| 17542 | } else { |
| 17543 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber.sibling; |
| 17544 | } |
| 17545 | |
| 17546 | var newFiber = updateSlot(returnFiber, oldFiber, newChildren[newIdx], expirationTime); |
| 17547 | |
| 17548 | if (newFiber === null) { |
| 17549 | // TODO: This breaks on empty slots like null children. That's |
| 17550 | // unfortunate because it triggers the slow path all the time. We need |
| 17551 | // a better way to communicate whether this was a miss or null, |
| 17552 | // boolean, undefined, etc. |
| 17553 | if (oldFiber === null) { |
| 17554 | oldFiber = nextOldFiber; |
| 17555 | } |
| 17556 | |
| 17557 | break; |
| 17558 | } |
| 17559 | |
| 17560 | if (shouldTrackSideEffects) { |
| 17561 | if (oldFiber && newFiber.alternate === null) { |
| 17562 | // We matched the slot, but we didn't reuse the existing fiber, so we |
no test coverage detected