(self)
| 366 | ) |
| 367 | |
| 368 | def test_blotter_processes_splits(self): |
| 369 | blotter = SimulationBlotter(equity_slippage=FixedSlippage()) |
| 370 | |
| 371 | # set up two open limit orders with very low limit prices, |
| 372 | # one for sid 1 and one for sid 2 |
| 373 | asset1 = self.asset_finder.retrieve_asset(1) |
| 374 | asset2 = self.asset_finder.retrieve_asset(2) |
| 375 | asset133 = self.asset_finder.retrieve_asset(133) |
| 376 | |
| 377 | blotter.order(asset1, 100, LimitOrder(10, asset=asset1)) |
| 378 | blotter.order(asset2, 100, LimitOrder(10, asset=asset2)) |
| 379 | |
| 380 | # send in splits for assets 133 and 2. We have no open orders for |
| 381 | # asset 133 so it should be ignored. |
| 382 | blotter.process_splits([(asset133, 0.5), (asset2, 0.3333)]) |
| 383 | |
| 384 | for asset in [asset1, asset2]: |
| 385 | order_lists = blotter.open_orders[asset] |
| 386 | self.assertIsNotNone(order_lists) |
| 387 | self.assertEqual(1, len(order_lists)) |
| 388 | |
| 389 | asset1_order = blotter.open_orders[1][0] |
| 390 | asset2_order = blotter.open_orders[2][0] |
| 391 | |
| 392 | # make sure the asset1 order didn't change |
| 393 | self.assertEqual(100, asset1_order.amount) |
| 394 | self.assertEqual(10, asset1_order.limit) |
| 395 | self.assertEqual(1, asset1_order.asset) |
| 396 | |
| 397 | # make sure the asset2 order did change |
| 398 | # to 300 shares at 3.33 |
| 399 | self.assertEqual(300, asset2_order.amount) |
| 400 | self.assertEqual(3.33, asset2_order.limit) |
| 401 | self.assertEqual(2, asset2_order.asset) |
| 402 | |
| 403 | |
| 404 | class SimParamsTestCase(zf.WithTradingCalendars, zf.ZiplineTestCase): |
nothing calls this directly
no test coverage detected