(
column,
columns,
visibleColumns,
headerRowIndex,
mergeDuplicateHeaders,
data
)
| 95 | } |
| 96 | |
| 97 | export function deleteColumn( |
| 98 | column, |
| 99 | columns, |
| 100 | visibleColumns, |
| 101 | headerRowIndex, |
| 102 | mergeDuplicateHeaders, |
| 103 | data |
| 104 | ) { |
| 105 | const rejectedColumnIds = getAffectedColumns( |
| 106 | column, |
| 107 | visibleColumns, |
| 108 | headerRowIndex, |
| 109 | mergeDuplicateHeaders |
| 110 | ); |
| 111 | |
| 112 | return { |
| 113 | columns: R.filter( |
| 114 | col => rejectedColumnIds.indexOf(col.id) === -1, |
| 115 | columns |
| 116 | ), |
| 117 | data: R.map(R.omit(rejectedColumnIds), data), |
| 118 | // NOTE - We're just clearing these so that there aren't any |
| 119 | // inconsistencies. In an ideal world, we would probably only |
| 120 | // update them if they contained one of the columns that we're |
| 121 | // trying to delete |
| 122 | ...clearSelection |
| 123 | }; |
| 124 | } |
| 125 | |
| 126 | export function getColumnIds( |
| 127 | column, |
no test coverage detected
searching dependent graphs…