(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime)
| 9386 | } |
| 9387 | |
| 9388 | function reconcileChildrenArray(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime) { |
| 9389 | // This algorithm can't optimize by searching from boths ends since we |
| 9390 | // don't have backpointers on fibers. I'm trying to see how far we can get |
| 9391 | // with that model. If it ends up not being worth the tradeoffs, we can |
| 9392 | // add it later. |
| 9393 | |
| 9394 | // Even with a two ended optimization, we'd want to optimize for the case |
| 9395 | // where there are few changes and brute force the comparison instead of |
| 9396 | // going for the Map. It'd like to explore hitting that path first in |
| 9397 | // forward-only mode and only go for the Map once we notice that we need |
| 9398 | // lots of look ahead. This doesn't handle reversal as well as two ended |
| 9399 | // search but that's unusual. Besides, for the two ended optimization to |
| 9400 | // work on Iterables, we'd need to copy the whole set. |
| 9401 | |
| 9402 | // In this first iteration, we'll just live with hitting the bad case |
| 9403 | // (adding everything to a Map) in for every insert/move. |
| 9404 | |
| 9405 | // If you change this code, also update reconcileChildrenIterator() which |
| 9406 | // uses the same algorithm. |
| 9407 | |
| 9408 | { |
| 9409 | // First, validate keys. |
| 9410 | var knownKeys = null; |
| 9411 | for (var i = 0; i < newChildren.length; i++) { |
| 9412 | var child = newChildren[i]; |
| 9413 | knownKeys = warnOnInvalidKey(child, knownKeys); |
| 9414 | } |
| 9415 | } |
| 9416 | |
| 9417 | var resultingFirstChild = null; |
| 9418 | var previousNewFiber = null; |
| 9419 | |
| 9420 | var oldFiber = currentFirstChild; |
| 9421 | var lastPlacedIndex = 0; |
| 9422 | var newIdx = 0; |
| 9423 | var nextOldFiber = null; |
| 9424 | for (; oldFiber !== null && newIdx < newChildren.length; newIdx++) { |
| 9425 | if (oldFiber.index > newIdx) { |
| 9426 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber; |
| 9427 | oldFiber = null; |
| 9428 | } else { |
| 9429 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber.sibling; |
| 9430 | } |
| 9431 | var newFiber = updateSlot(returnFiber, oldFiber, newChildren[newIdx], expirationTime); |
| 9432 | if (newFiber === null) { |
| 9433 | // TODO: This breaks on empty slots like null children. That's |
| 9434 | // unfortunate because it triggers the slow path all the time. We need |
| 9435 | // a better way to communicate whether this was a miss or null, |
| 9436 | // boolean, undefined, etc. |
| 9437 | if (oldFiber === null) { |
| 9438 | oldFiber = nextOldFiber; |
| 9439 | } |
| 9440 | break; |
| 9441 | } |
| 9442 | if (shouldTrackSideEffects) { |
| 9443 | if (oldFiber && newFiber.alternate === null) { |
| 9444 | // We matched the slot, but we didn't reuse the existing fiber, so we |
| 9445 | // need to delete the existing child. |
no test coverage detected