Code for the automated detection of artisanal gold mines in Sentinel-2 satellite imagery, with links to related journalism. The data are presented at amazonminingwatch.org. Amazon Mining Watch is a partnership betwen the Pulitzer Center's Rainforest Investigations Network, Amazon Conservation Association, and Earth Genome.
Quick links: * NOVEMBER 2025 UPDATES * MARCH 2024 DATA AND MODEL UPDATES * INTERPRETING THE FINDINGS * JOURNALISM * METHODOLOGY * MINING AND AIRSTRIPS DATASETS
Ahead of COP in Belém, we significantly redeveloped Amazon Mining Watch, with:
The transition to new models remains work in progress. On the website, 2024 and 2025 data reflects new models outputs, which have largely been cleaned of false positive detections by a human reviewer.
Development of the mining detector halted in 2022 when we lost access to the geospatial computing platform at Descartes Labs. With the arrival of new API methods to export pixels from Google Earth Engine (GEE), we were able to swap GEE in for Descartes Labs as image source. The original Amazon Mining Watch survey was built on 2020 composite Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. With the redevelopment comes:
Mining expanded each year in the study period, notably into previously untouched areas of Yanomami, Kayapó, and Munduruku indigenous territories. It continues to spread into scattered and remote regions of the Amazon rainforest. Even some of the tiniest isolated detections are working mines. In western Amazonas, Brazil, floating dredges are scooping soils from river banks and bottoms in the search for gold, seen in the ravaged riverbanks of Rio Puré and Rio Boia in the most recent years' data.
The mining of concern here touches every country in the Amazon basin. In the typical process, miners slash the rainforest to bare earth and then pump water through underlying sediments to liberate the minerals. They introduce mercury to form an amalgam with the gold, to separte it from other particles, and later they burn off the mercury to arrive at a fairly pure gold metal. This type of mining is called artisanal because it is practiced by small groups of individuals with some machinery, such as pumps, dredges, and excavators. The mining proceeds along streams and rivers, which provide water and access into the rainforest.
Scars from the mining can be seen from satellite. On the banks of a river, you will observe muddy flats jumbled together with multi-colored toxic wastewater pools. The pools can be brown, tan, yellow, different shades of green, even turquoise. For the most part they are irregular in size, shape, and orientation. Often nearby you can observe miners' encampments, perhaps with blue-tarped tents, and in well-developed mines, a dirt airstrip cut to fly in miners and to fly out the gold.
Here are some characteristic examples of mines:
(These are mines.)
With limited bootstrap sampling, we extrapolated to run over the whole of the Amazon basin. There are some false detections, and we encourage users to apply discretion in interpreting the findings. Terrain features that can masquerade as mines include sandbars in rivers, braided rivers, farm ponds, and aquaculture ponds, like so:
(These are not mines.)
You can recognize aquaculture ponds by their geometric shape, efficient use of space, and presence in agricultural zones.
From the March 2024 data release, we note in particular some false positives from aquaculture and other wet industrial operations around Manaus and an area of landslides in hilly terrain of southern Loreto, Peru.
A more common model error is the false negative, where the model fails to detect a mine or the full extent of a mine.
Where the rainforest has begun to heal, mine scars may not be detected in later years, and so mined area both expands and recedes over time. We see some value in this model response and we decided not to correct it.
On the whole, false detections are relatively few given how widespread the mining is, and we hope this will be a useful resource to those interested in tracking mining activity in the region.
The Amazon basin encompasses an enormous, complex geography extending over 8.5 million square kilometers. For each quarterly dataset, the neural networks make over 100 million assessments for mining. By constrast, in late 2025, the labeled data we withhold to evaluate model performance consists of around 6400 examples. The metrics we derive from the withheld dataset can only be considered roughly indicative of how the networks will perform in extrapolating to the whole of the territory. At threshold t=0.925, the 2025 model ensemble operates with a precision of 99.6% and a recall of 79.6% for the detection of mine scars, which translates to an overall accuracy of 98.1%. Those metrics apply before post-processing, aggregation of detections to polygons, and human review.
For the 2024 models, which yield the 2018-2023 data on the Amazon Mining Watch website, we ran the following complimentary test. We evaulated by hand a random sample of 500 patch detections from 2023-year data. Of the 500 samples, 498 show scars from artisanal mining. One is an industrial mine, and one is a remnant of the construction of the Balbina dam and power station from around 1985. From this, we can estimate the precision or positive predictive value for that classifier again (in a numerical coincidence) to be 99.6%. In essence, the precision tells you the likelihood that a patch marked as a mine is actually a mine.
The primary goal of this work is to detect mines, and our classification operates on square image patches covering around twenty hectares each. However, we have been working to improve area estimates, first by deploying an NDVI mask to exclude intact vegetation, and more recently, deploying a fine-tuned SAM2 segmentation model on RGB channels of the Sentinel-2 imagery to delineate the borders of the mining scars.
As of March, 2026, this remains a work in progress. Area estimates on amazonminingwatch.org still derive from NDVI masking, which somewhat undercounts areas in forest backgrounds and can have high uncertainties over bare ground. The first SAM2 mining scar rasters are available on source.coop.
We would like to thank Michael Braun, Daemon Li, and Divas Subedi, masters students in computer science at Georgia Tech University, who fine-tuned and tested the SAM2 model for this work.

This work grew out of a series of collaborations with journalists and with advocates at Survival International seeking to expose illegal gold mining activity and document its impacts on the environment and on local indigenous communities. We began identifying mines by sight in satellite imagery. Later, some high school classes helped sift through images. Finally it made sense to try to automate the identification of mine sites. The training datasets for the machine-learned models followed from those initial human surveys.
Rough dirt airstrips, often cut illegally from the forest and unregistered with authorities, allow miners to access the mines and to fly out the gold. The Intercept Brasil and The New York Times surveyed over a thousand clandestine airstrips in Brazil's Legal Amazon, identifying 362 landing strips within 20 kilometers of mining activity. The inquiry into the airstrips' role in the expansion of mining led to a pair of stories and a short documentary film:
The airstrip location data are available for download. The clandestine airstrips dataset is the result of a collaborative reporting effort by The Intercept Brasil, The New York Times, and the Rainforest Investigations Network, an initiative of The Pulitzer Center. The Intercept Brasil created the project with
$ claude mcp add mining-detector \
-- python -m otcore.mcp_server <graph>