OSv was originally designed and implemented by Cloudius Systems (now ScyllaDB) however currently it is being maintained and enhanced by a small community of volunteers. If you are into systems programming or want to learn and help us improve OSv, then please contact us on OSv Google Group forum or feel free to pickup any good issues for newcomers. For details on how to format and send patches, please read this wiki (we do NOT accept pull requests).
OSv is an open-source versatile modular unikernel designed to run single unmodified Linux application securely as microVM on top of a hypervisor, when compared to traditional operating systems which were designed for a vast range of physical machines. Built from the ground up for effortless deployment and management of microservices and serverless apps, with superior performance.
OSv has been designed to run unmodified x86-64 and AArch64 Linux binaries as is, which effectively makes it a Linux binary compatible unikernel (for more details about Linux ABI compatibility please read this doc). In particular OSv can run many managed language runtimes including JVM, Python, Node.JS, Ruby, Erlang, and applications built on top of those runtimes. It can also run applications written in languages compiling directly to native machine code like C, C++, Golang and Rust as well as native images produced by GraalVM and WebAssembly/Wasmer.
OSv can boot as fast as ~5 ms on Firecracker using as low as 15 MB of memory. OSv can run on many hypervisors including QEMU/KVM, Firecracker, Cloud Hypervisor, Xen, VMWare, VirtualBox and Hyperkit as well as open clouds like AWS EC2, GCE and OpenStack.
For more information about OSv, see the main wiki page and http://osv.io/.
In order to run an application on OSv, one needs to build an image by fusing OSv kernel, and
the application files together. This, in high level can be achieved in two ways, either:
- by using the shell script located at ./scripts/build
that builds the kernel from sources and fuses it with application files, or
- by using the capstan tool that uses pre-built
kernel and combines it with application files to produce a final image.
If your intention is to try to run your app on OSv with the least effort possible, you should pursue the capstan
route. For introduction please read this
crash course.
For more details about capstan please read
this more detailed documentation. Pre-built OSv kernel files
(ovs-loader.qemu) can be automatically downloaded by capstan from
the OSv regular releases page or manually from
the nightly releases repo.
If you are comfortable with make and GCC toolchain and want to try the latest OSv code, then you should read this part of the readme to guide you how to set up your development environment and build OSv kernel and application images.
We aim to release OSv 2-3 times a year. You can find the latest one on github along with number of published artifacts including kernel and some modules.
In addition, we have set up Travis-based CI/CD pipeline where each commit to the master and ipv6 branches triggers full build of the latest kernel and publishes some artifacts to the nightly releases repo. Each commit also triggers publishing of new Docker "build tool chain" images to the Docker hub.
Good bit of the design of OSv is pretty well explained in the Components of OSv wiki page. You can find even more information in the original USENIX paper and its presentation.
In addition, you can find a lot of good information about design of specific OSv components on the main wiki page and http://osv.io/ and http://blog.osv.io/. Unfortunately, some of that information may be outdated (especially on http://osv.io/), so it is always best to ask on the mailing list if in doubt.
There are no official up-to date performance metrics comparing OSv to other unikernels or Linux. In general OSv lags behind Linux in disk-I/O-intensive workloads partially due to coarse-grained locking in VFS around read/write operations as described in this issue. In network-I/O-intensive workloads, OSv should fare better (or at least used to as Linux has advanced a lot since) as shown with performance tests of Redis and Memcached. You can find some old "numbers" on the main wiki, http://osv.io/benchmarks and some papers listed at the bottom of this readme.
So OSv is probably not best suited to run MySQL or ElasticSearch, but should deliver pretty solid performance for general stateless applications like microservices or serverless (at least as some papers show).
At this moment (as of July 2021) the size of the uncompressed OSv kernel (kernel.elf artifact) is around
6.7 MB (the compressed is ~ 2.7 MB). This is not that small comparing to Linux kernel and quite large comparing
to other unikernels. However, bear in mind that OSv kernel (being unikernel) provides subset of functionality
of the following Linux libraries (see their approximate size on Linux host):
- libresolv.so.2 (100 K)
- libc.so.6 (2 MB)
- libm.so.6 (1.4 MB)
- ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (184 K)
- libpthread.so.0 (156 K)
- libdl.so.2 (20 K)
- librt.so.1 (40 K)
- libstdc++.so.6 (2 MB)
- libaio.so.1 (16 K)
- libxenstore.so.3.0 (32 K)
- libcrypt.so.1 (44 K)
The equivalent static version of libstdc++.so.6 is actually linked --whole-archive so that
any C++ apps can run without having to add libstdc++.so.6 to the image (whether it needs it or not).
Finally, OSv kernel comes with ZFS implementation which in theory later can be extracted as a
separate library. The
point of this is to illustrate that comparing OSv kernel size to Linux kernel size does not
quite make sense.
OSv, with Read-Only FS and networking off, can boot as fast as ~5 ms on Firecracker and even faster around ~3 ms on QEMU with the microvm machine. However, in general the boot time will depend on many factors like hypervisor including settings of individual para-virtual devices, filesystem (ZFS, ROFS, RAMFS or Virtio-FS) and some boot parameters. Please note that by default OSv images get built with ZFS filesystem.
For example, the boot time of ZFS image on Firecracker is ~40 ms and regular QEMU ~200 ms these days. Also,
newer versions of QEMU (>=4.0) are typically faster to boot. Booting on QEMU in PVH/HVM mode (aka direct kernel boot, enabled
by -k option of run.py) should always be faster as OSv is directly invoked in 64-bit long mode. Please see
this Wiki for the brief review of the boot
methods OSv supports.
Finally, some boot parameters passed to the kernel may affect the boot time:
- --console serial - this disables VGA console that is slow to initialize and can shave off 60-70 ms on QEMU
- --nopci - this disables enumeration of PCI devices especially if we know none are present (QEMU with microvm or Firecracker) and can shave off 10-20 ms
- --redirect=/tmp/out - writing to the console can impact the performance quite severely (30-40%) if application logs
a lot, so redirecting standard output and error to a file might speed up performance quite a lot
You can always see boot time breakdown by adding --bootchart parameter:
./scripts/run.py -e '--bootchart /hello'
OSv v0.54.0-197-g1f0df4e4
eth0: 192.168.122.15
disk read (real mode): 25.85ms, (+25.85ms)
uncompress lzloader.elf: 45.11ms, (+19.26ms)
TLS initialization: 45.72ms, (+0.61ms)
.init functions: 47.61ms, (+1.89ms)
SMP launched: 48.08ms, (+0.47ms)
VFS initialized: 50.99ms, (+2.91ms)
Network initialized: 51.12ms, (+0.14ms)
pvpanic done: 51.25ms, (+0.13ms)
pci enumerated: 61.55ms, (+10.29ms)
drivers probe: 61.55ms, (+0.00ms)
drivers loaded: 135.91ms, (+74.36ms)
ROFS mounted: 136.98ms, (+1.07ms)
Total time: 138.16ms, (+1.18ms)
Cmdline: /hello
Hello from C code
OSv needs at least 15 M of memory to run a hello world app. Even though it is half of what it was 2 years ago, it is still quite a lot comparing to other unikernels. We are planning to further lower this number by reducing size of the kernel, adding self-tuning logic to L1/L2 memory pools and making application threads use lazily allocated stacks.
OSv comes with around 140 unit tests that get executed upon every commit and run on ScyllaDB servers. There are also number of extra
tests located under tests/ sub-tree that are not automated at this point.
You can run unit tests in number of ways:
./scripts/build check # Create ZFS test image and run all tests on QEMU
./scripts/build check fs=rofs # Create ROFS test image and run all tests on QEMU
./scripts/build image=tests && \ # Create ZFS test image and run all tests on Firecracker
./scripts/test.py -p firecracker
./scripts/build image=tests && \ # Create ZFS test image and run all tests on QEMU
./scripts/test.py -p qemu_microvm # with microvm machine
In addition, there is an Automated Testing Framework
that can be used to run around 30 real apps, some of them
under stress using ab or wrk tools. The intention is to catch any regressions that might be missed
by unit tests.
Finally, one can use Docker files to test OSv on different Linux distribution.
OSv can only be built on a 64-bit x86 and ARM Linux distribution. Please note that this means the "x86_64" or "amd64" version for 64-bit x86 and "aarch64" or "arm64" version for ARM respectively.
In order to build OSv kernel you need a physical or virtual machine with Linux distribution on it and GCC toolchain and all necessary packages and libraries OSv build process depends on. The fastest way to set it up is to use the Docker files that OSv comes with. You can use them to build your own Docker image and then start it in order to build OSv kernel or run an app on OSv inside of it. Please note that the main docker file depends on pre-built base Docker images for Ubuntu or Fedora that get published to DockerHub upon every commit. This should speed up building the final images as all necessary packages are installed as part of the base images.
Alternatively, you can manually clone OSv repo and use setup.py to install all required packages and libraries, as long as it supports your Linux distribution, and you have both git and python 3 installed on your machine:
git clone https://github.com/cloudius-systems/osv.git
cd osv && git submodule update --init --recursive
./scripts/setup.py
The setup.py recognizes and installs packages for number of Linux distributions including Fedora, Ubuntu,
Debian, LinuxMint and RedHat ones
(Scientific Linux, NauLinux, CentOS Linux, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Oracle Linux). Please note that we actively
maintain and te