()
| 135 | // of latency |
| 136 | Thread t = new Thread(new Runnable() { |
| 137 | public void run() { |
| 138 | boolean gotInterrupt = false; |
| 139 | try { |
| 140 | do { |
| 141 | try { |
| 142 | if (waitForInterrupt(irqPin, 100)) { |
| 143 | gotInterrupt = true; |
| 144 | } |
| 145 | if (gotInterrupt && serveInterrupts) { |
| 146 | irqMethod.invoke(irqObject, irqPin); |
| 147 | gotInterrupt = false; |
| 148 | } |
| 149 | // if we received an interrupt while interrupts were disabled |
| 150 | // we still deliver it the next time interrupts get enabled |
| 151 | // not sure if everyone agrees with this logic though |
| 152 | } catch (RuntimeException e) { |
| 153 | // make sure we're not busy spinning on error |
| 154 | Thread.sleep(100); |
| 155 | } |
| 156 | } while (!Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()); |
| 157 | } catch (Exception e) { |
| 158 | // terminate the thread on any unexpected exception that might occur |
| 159 | System.err.println("Terminating interrupt handling for pin " + irqPin + " after catching: " + e.getMessage()); |
| 160 | } |
| 161 | } |
| 162 | }, "GPIO" + pin + " IRQ"); |
| 163 | |
| 164 | t.setPriority(Thread.MAX_PRIORITY); |
nothing calls this directly
no test coverage detected