()
| 474 | |
| 475 | #[test] |
| 476 | fn test_form_identifier() -> Result<()> { |
| 477 | let err = form_identifier(&[]).expect_err("empty identifiers didn't fail"); |
| 478 | let expected = "Internal error: Incorrect number of identifiers: 0.\n\ |
| 479 | This issue was likely caused by a bug in DataFusion's code. Please help us to resolve this \ |
| 480 | by filing a bug report in our issue tracker: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues"; |
| 481 | assert!(expected.starts_with(&err.strip_backtrace())); |
| 482 | |
| 483 | let ids = vec!["a".to_string()]; |
| 484 | let (qualifier, column) = form_identifier(&ids)?; |
| 485 | assert_eq!(qualifier, None); |
| 486 | assert_eq!(column, "a"); |
| 487 | |
| 488 | let ids = vec!["a".to_string(), "b".to_string()]; |
| 489 | let (qualifier, column) = form_identifier(&ids)?; |
| 490 | assert_eq!(qualifier, Some(TableReference::bare("a"))); |
| 491 | assert_eq!(column, "b"); |
| 492 | |
| 493 | let ids = vec!["a".to_string(), "b".to_string(), "c".to_string()]; |
| 494 | let (qualifier, column) = form_identifier(&ids)?; |
| 495 | assert_eq!(qualifier, Some(TableReference::partial("a", "b"))); |
| 496 | assert_eq!(column, "c"); |
| 497 | |
| 498 | let ids = vec![ |
| 499 | "a".to_string(), |
| 500 | "b".to_string(), |
| 501 | "c".to_string(), |
| 502 | "d".to_string(), |
| 503 | ]; |
| 504 | let (qualifier, column) = form_identifier(&ids)?; |
| 505 | assert_eq!(qualifier, Some(TableReference::full("a", "b", "c"))); |
| 506 | assert_eq!(column, "d"); |
| 507 | |
| 508 | let err = form_identifier(&[ |
| 509 | "a".to_string(), |
| 510 | "b".to_string(), |
| 511 | "c".to_string(), |
| 512 | "d".to_string(), |
| 513 | "e".to_string(), |
| 514 | ]) |
| 515 | .expect_err("too many identifiers didn't fail"); |
| 516 | let expected = "Internal error: Incorrect number of identifiers: 5.\n\ |
| 517 | This issue was likely caused by a bug in DataFusion's code. Please help us to resolve this \ |
| 518 | by filing a bug report in our issue tracker: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues"; |
| 519 | assert!(expected.starts_with(&err.strip_backtrace())); |
| 520 | |
| 521 | Ok(()) |
| 522 | } |
| 523 | } |
nothing calls this directly
no test coverage detected
searching dependent graphs…