(
string_array: &V,
length_array: &Int64Array,
fill_array: Option<V2>,
)
| 363 | } |
| 364 | |
| 365 | fn lpad_impl<'a, V, V2, T>( |
| 366 | string_array: &V, |
| 367 | length_array: &Int64Array, |
| 368 | fill_array: Option<V2>, |
| 369 | ) -> Result<ArrayRef> |
| 370 | where |
| 371 | V: StringArrayType<'a>, |
| 372 | V2: StringArrayType<'a>, |
| 373 | T: OffsetSizeTrait, |
| 374 | { |
| 375 | let array = if let Some(fill_array) = fill_array { |
| 376 | let mut builder: GenericStringBuilder<T> = GenericStringBuilder::new(); |
| 377 | let mut fill_chars_buf = Vec::new(); |
| 378 | |
| 379 | for ((string, target_len), fill) in string_array |
| 380 | .iter() |
| 381 | .zip(length_array.iter()) |
| 382 | .zip(fill_array.iter()) |
| 383 | { |
| 384 | if let (Some(string), Some(target_len), Some(fill)) = |
| 385 | (string, target_len, fill) |
| 386 | { |
| 387 | if target_len > i32::MAX as i64 { |
| 388 | return exec_err!( |
| 389 | "lpad requested length {target_len} too large, maximum allowed length is {}", |
| 390 | i32::MAX |
| 391 | ); |
| 392 | } |
| 393 | |
| 394 | let target_len = if target_len < 0 { |
| 395 | 0 |
| 396 | } else { |
| 397 | target_len as usize |
| 398 | }; |
| 399 | if target_len == 0 { |
| 400 | builder.append_value(""); |
| 401 | continue; |
| 402 | } |
| 403 | |
| 404 | if string.is_ascii() && fill.is_ascii() { |
| 405 | // ASCII fast path: byte length == character length. |
| 406 | let str_len = string.len(); |
| 407 | if target_len < str_len { |
| 408 | builder.append_value(&string[..target_len]); |
| 409 | } else if fill.is_empty() { |
| 410 | builder.append_value(string); |
| 411 | } else { |
| 412 | let pad_len = target_len - str_len; |
| 413 | let fill_len = fill.len(); |
| 414 | let full_reps = pad_len / fill_len; |
| 415 | let remainder = pad_len % fill_len; |
| 416 | for _ in 0..full_reps { |
| 417 | builder.write_str(fill)?; |
| 418 | } |
| 419 | if remainder > 0 { |
| 420 | builder.write_str(&fill[..remainder])?; |
| 421 | } |
| 422 | builder.append_value(string); |
nothing calls this directly
no test coverage detected
searching dependent graphs…