( invariant: Invariant, ctx: InvariantContext, appendViolationsTo: Violation[], )
| 63 | } |
| 64 | |
| 65 | async function runOneInvariantInto( |
| 66 | invariant: Invariant, |
| 67 | ctx: InvariantContext, |
| 68 | appendViolationsTo: Violation[], |
| 69 | ): Promise<InvariantRunStats> { |
| 70 | const t0 = Date.now(); |
| 71 | try { |
| 72 | const result = await invariant.check(ctx); |
| 73 | appendViolationsTo.push(...result.violations); |
| 74 | return { |
| 75 | ms: Date.now() - t0, |
| 76 | checked: result.checked, |
| 77 | violations: result.violations.length, |
| 78 | }; |
| 79 | } catch (err) { |
| 80 | const error = err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err); |
| 81 | ctx.logger.error({ err, invariant: invariant.name }, 'Invariant check threw'); |
| 82 | // Record a meta-violation so the failure is visible in the report |
| 83 | // and operators don't see a silently-incomplete check. |
| 84 | const metaViolation: Violation = { |
| 85 | invariant: invariant.name, |
| 86 | severity: 'warning', |
| 87 | subject_type: 'configuration', |
| 88 | subject_id: invariant.name, |
| 89 | message: `Invariant check failed to run: ${error}`, |
| 90 | }; |
| 91 | appendViolationsTo.push(metaViolation); |
| 92 | return { |
| 93 | ms: Date.now() - t0, |
| 94 | checked: 0, |
| 95 | violations: 1, |
| 96 | error, |
| 97 | }; |
| 98 | } |
| 99 | } |
no test coverage detected