github.com/TestSprite/testsprite-cli @v0.1.2

<img src="https://github.com/TestSprite/testsprite-cli/raw/v0.1.2/assets/testsprite-logo-light.png" alt="TestSprite" width="420">

The verification layer for the agentic coding era.

AI ships code in minutes — verifying it hasn't. testsprite opens your live app, uses it like a real user, and shows your coding agent exactly what broke — so it fixes its own work before a bug ever reaches you.

_{Proof, in public: verification beats model size. With this CLI in the loop, the cheapest model in the field shipped the most correct app on an open leaderboard — 89%, at half the cost of the priciest one. See the leaderboard →}

⭐ Help us reach more developers and grow the TestSprite community. Star this repo!

_{▶ Watch the launch video — the three hard limits every coding agent hits, and the loop that breaks them (4 min).}

What is it?

TestSprite is the AI testing platform 100,000+ teams use to test their software, frontend and backend — in the cloud, against the live product, not mocks. This repo is its official CLI.

It puts that platform in your coding agent's hands: the agent verifies every behavior it ships, and what broke comes back as one self-consistent bundle it can act on — no dashboard scraping. Humans drive the same surface from a terminal or CI.

⭐️ Star the Repository

If you find testsprite useful, a GitHub Star ⭐️ would be greatly appreciated — it helps other builders (and their agents) find the project, and stars notify you about new releases.

Quickstart

Requires Node.js ≥ 20. (No global install? npx @testsprite/testsprite-cli works too.)

npm install -g @testsprite/testsprite-cli
testsprite setup

testsprite setup prompts for your API key, verifies it, and installs the verification-loop skill for your coding agent (claude, cursor, cline, antigravity, codex, etc.) — one command, so your agent is wired to verify its own work. Non-interactive (CI / onboarding scripts):

TESTSPRITE_API_KEY=sk-... testsprite setup --from-env --yes --agent claude

Pointing a coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Cline, …) at TestSprite? Have it run testsprite setup first — that installs the verification skill, so the agent knows how to create, run, and triage tests on its own (instead of guessing from this README). New here? Start with the getting-started overview.

From there, the loop runs on its own — an example session, typed by the coding agent:

# 1 — describe the behavior you want to guarantee, run it, wait
testsprite test create --project proj_8f0f6 --type frontend \
  --plan-from ./checkout-flow.plan.json --run --wait --output json
#   → exits 1: the run failed

# 2 — pull ONE self-consistent failure bundle
testsprite test failure get test_3a9f21c7 --out ./.testsprite/failure

# 3 — the agent reads the bundle, fixes the code, then replays
testsprite test rerun test_3a9f21c7 --wait --output json
#   → exits 0: passed. The test now lives in your durable suite.

Prefer to configure each step by hand (or learn the surface offline with --dry-run first)? See Manual setup and Install & verify.

Commands

The earlier command names — init, auth configure, auth whoami, auth logout — still work as hidden, deprecated aliases (each prints a one-line notice pointing at the new name), so existing scripts keep running. auth configure now runs the full setup (it also installs the skill).

📚 Full reference — every command, flag, and example: DOCUMENTATION.md, including configuration & profiles, scripting, and exit codes.

Why a CLI for coding agents?

• 🧪 Tests like a real user. Runs against a live browser or API in the cloud — real clicks, real navigation, real assertions. Not a mock.
• 🤖 Agent-shaped output. test failure get returns one bundle — the failing step, its neighbors, screenshots, DOM snapshots, the test source, a root-cause hypothesis, and a recommended fix target — all sharing a single snapshotId. The CLI refuses to stitch data from two different runs, so an agent never reasons over a frankenstein context.
• ♻️ A loop, not a one-shot. create → run → failure get → fix → rerun — every pass is banked, not thrown away.
• 📐 Scriptable & deterministic. Stable --output json contract, predictable exit codes, and a --dry-run that exercises the full code path offline with canned data.
• 🔌 One command to onboard your agent. testsprite agent install claude drops a ready-made skill file into your repo so your coding agent knows how to drive the loop on its own.

How it works

Every time your agent changes code, it asks one question: is this behavior already covered by the suite?

• Not yet covered → testsprite test create — describe the new behavior, run it.
• Already covered → testsprite test rerun — replay the existing tests, so nothing that used to work breaks silently.
• Something fails → testsprite test failure get — one self-consistent bundle; the agent fixes the code and reruns.

Every pass is banked into a durable suite, so coverage compounds as the project grows — a lasting record of every requirement it has ever gotten right, far bigger than any context window.

flowchart TD
    A["🤖 Your coding agent

Claude Code · Codex · Antigravity · Kimi · Cursor · Trae …"]
    D{"behavior already

covered by the suite?"}
    B["<b>testsprite test create</b>

new behavior → new test"]
    R["<b>testsprite test rerun</b>

replay the existing tests"]
    C{{"☁️ TestSprite testing agent

runs the test like a real user against

real browsers & real APIs on Cloud"}}
    F["<b>testsprite test failure get</b>

ONE self-consistent bundle:

failing step · screenshots · DOM ·

root-cause · recommended fix"]
    S[("📚 Durable integration suite

grows with every pass")]

    A -->|"writes / changes code"| D
    D -->|"no — new behavior"| B
    D -->|"yes"| R
    B --> C
    R --> C
    C -->|"pass ✅"| S
    C -->|"fail ❌"| F
    F -->|"agent reads the bundle

& fixes the code"| A
    S -.->|"defines what's covered"| D

The cloud is a black box on purpose: your agent describes intent and reads results. It never has to know how the test was driven — only what a real user experienced.

Proved in public

On CoderCup — an open leaderboard where frontier coding agents build the same app under the same rules, with TestSprite as the referee — the cheapest model in the field shipped the most correct app on the board: 89%, at half the cost of the priciest one.

That's the point of all of this: you no longer need the biggest, most expensive model to ship software you can trust — top-tier quality, without paying top-tier prices, within reach of every team.

Getting help

• 📚 CLI reference — DOCUMENTATION.md
• 🌐 Platform docs — testsprite.com/docs
• 🐛 Issues & feature requests — GitHub issues
• 💬 Quick questions — Discord, or testsprite --help / `testsprite