<strong>An Adaptive Gradient Boosting Library</strong>
Gradient boosting that adjusts to concept drift in imbalanced multi-class data.
Built from scratch in Rust, PKBoost (Performance-Based Knowledge Booster) manages changing data distributions in fraud detection with a fraud rate of 0.2%. It shows less than 2% degradation under drift. In comparison, XGBoost experiences a 31.8% drop and LightGBM a 42.5% drop. PKBoost outperforms XGBoost by 10-18% on the Standard dataset when no drift is applied. It employs information theory with Shannon entropy and Newton Raphson to identify shifts in rare events and trigger an adaptive "metamorphosis" for real-time recovery.
"Most boosting libraries overlook concept drift. PKBoost identifies it and evolves to persist."
Perfect for: Multi-class fraud detection, real-time medical diagnosis, anomaly detection in changing environments, or any scenario where data evolves over time and minority classes are critical.
See CHANGELOG_V2.md for full details.
Clone the repository and build:
git clone https://github.com/Pushp-Kharat1/pkboost.git
cd pkboost
cargo build --release
Run the benchmark:
data/)ls data/ # Should show creditcard_train.csv, creditcard_val.csv, etc.
cargo run --release --bin benchmark
To train and predict (see src/bin/benchmark.rs for a full example):
use pkboost::*;
use csv;
use std::error::Error;
fn main() -> Result<(), Box<dyn Error>> {
// Load CSV with headers: feature1,feature2,...,Class
let (x_train, y_train) = load_csv("train.csv")?;
let (x_val, y_val) = load_csv("val.csv")?;
let (x_test, y_test) = load_csv("test.csv")?;
// Auto-configure based on data characteristics
let mut model = OptimizedPKBoostShannon::auto(&x_train, &y_train);
// Train with early stopping on validation set
model.fit(
&x_train,
&y_train,
Some((&x_val, &y_val)), // Optional validation
true // Verbose output
)?;
// Predict probabilities (not classes)
let test_probs = model.predict_proba(&x_test)?;
// Evaluate
let pr_auc = calculate_pr_auc(&y_test, &test_probs);
println!("PR-AUC: {:.4}", pr_auc);
Ok(())
}
// Helper function (put in your code)
fn load_csv(path: &str) -> Result<(Vec<Vec<f64>>, Vec<f64>), Box<dyn Error>> {
let mut reader = csv::Reader::from_path(path)?;
let headers = reader.headers()?.clone();
let target_col_index = headers.iter().position(|h| h == "Class")
.ok_or("Class column not found")?;
let mut features = Vec::new();
let mut labels = Vec::new();
for result in reader.records() {
let record = result?;
let mut row: Vec<f64> = Vec::new();
for (i, value) in record.iter().enumerate() {
if i == target_col_index {
labels.push(value.parse()?);
} else {
let parsed_value = if value.is_empty() {
f64::NAN
} else {
value.parse()?
};
row.push(parsed_value);
}
}
features.push(row);
}
Ok((features, labels))
}
Expected CSV format:
- Header row required
- Target column named "Class" with binary values (0.0 or 1.0) for classification
- For regression, target column can have any continuous values
- All other columns treated as numerical features
- Empty values treated as NaN (median-imputed)
- No categorical support (encode them first)
- For data loading examples, see src/bin/*.rs files like benchmark.rs. Supports CSV via csv crate.
Regression usage:
use pkboost::*;
let mut model = PKBoostRegressor::auto(&x_train, &y_train);
model.fit(&x_train, &y_train, Some((&x_val, &y_val)), true)?;
let predictions = model.predict(&x_test)?;
let rmse = calculate_rmse(&y_test, &predictions);
let r2 = calculate_r2(&y_test, &predictions);
println!("RMSE: {:.4}, R²: {:.4}", rmse, r2);
Multi-class usage:
use pkboost::MultiClassPKBoost;
// y_train contains class labels: 0.0, 1.0, 2.0, ...
let mut model = MultiClassPKBoost::new(3); // 3 classes
model.fit(&x_train, &y_train, None, true)?;
let probs = model.predict_proba(&x_test)?; // [n_samples, n_classes]
let predictions = model.predict(&x_test)?; // class indices
let accuracy = predictions.iter().zip(y_test.iter())
.filter(|(&pred, &true_y)| pred == true_y as usize)
.count() as f64 / y_test.len() as f64;
println!("Accuracy: {:.2}%", accuracy * 100.0);
auto_tune_principled profiles your dataset for optimal params—no manual tuning needed.AdversarialLivingBooster monitors vulnerability scores to detect drift and trigger retraining, such as pruning unused features through "metabolism" tracking.Metrics Built-In: PR-AUC, ROC-AUC, F1@0.5, and threshold optimization are available out-of-the-box.
For full mathematical derivations, Refer to: Math.pdf
Testing methodology: All models use default settings with no hyperparameter tuning. This reflects real-world usage where most practitioners cannot dedicate time to extensive tuning.
PKBoost's auto-tuning provides an edge—it automatically detects imbalance and adjusts parameters. LGBM/XGB can match these results with tuning but require expert knowledge.
Reproducibility: All benchmark code is in src/bin/benchmark.rs. Data splits: 60% train, 20% val, 20% test. LGBM/XGB used default params from their Rust crates. Full benchmarks (10+ datasets): See BENCHMARKS.md.
| Dataset | Samples | Imbalance | Model | PR-AUC | F1-AUC | ROC-AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credit Card | 170,884 | 0.2% (extreme) | PKBoost | 87.8% | 87.4% | 97.5% |
| LightGBM | 79.3% | 71.3% | 92.1% | |||
| XGBoost | 74.5% | 79.8% | 91.7% | |||
| Improvements | vs LGBM | +10.4% | +22.7% | +5.7% | ||
| vs XGBoost | +17.9% | +9.7% | +6.1% | |||
| Pima Diabetes | 460 | 35.0% (balanced) | PKBoost | 98.0% | 93.7% | 98.6% |
| LightGBM | 62.9% | 48.8% | 82.4% | |||
| XGBoost | 68.0% | 60.0% | 82.0% | |||
| Improvements | vs LGBM | +55.7% | +92.0% | +19.6% | ||
| vs XGBoost | +44.0% | +56.1% | +20.1% | |||
| Breast Cancer | 341 | 37.2% (balanced) | PKBoost | 97.9% | 93.2% | 98.6% |
| LightGBM | 99.1% | 96.3% | 99.2% | |||
| XGBoost | 99.2% | 95.1% | 99.4% | |||
| Improvements | vs LGBM | -1.2% | -3.3% | -0.7% | ||
| vs XGBoost | -1.4% | -2.1% | -0.8% | |||
| Heart Disease | 181 | 45.9% (balanced) | PKBoost | 87.8% | 82.5% | 88.5% |
| Ionosphere | 210 | 35.7% (balanced) | PKBoost | 98.0% | 93.7% | 98.5% |
| LightGBM | 95.4% | 88.9% | 96.0% | |||
| XGBoost | 97.2% | 88.9% | 97.5% | |||
| Improvements | vs LGBM | +2.7% | +5.4% | +2.7% | ||
| vs XGBoost | +0.8% | +5.4% | +1.1% | |||
| Sonar | 124 | 46.8% (balanced) | PKBoost | 91.8% | 87.2% | 93.6% |
| SpamBase | 2,760 | 39.4% (balanced) | PKBoost | 98.0% | 93.3% | 98.0% |
| Adult | - | 24.1% (balanced) | PKBoost | 81.2% | 71.9% | 92.0% |
| Dataset | Classes | Imbalance | Model | Accuracy | Macro-F1 | Time(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synthetic-5 | 5 | 16.7:1 (50%/3%) | PKBoost | 100.0% | 1.0000 | 3.43 |
| LightGBM | 71.8% | 0.5835 | 0.87 | |||
| XGBoost | 70.7% | 0.5568 | 1.57 | |||
| Improvements | vs LGBM | +39.3% | +71.4% | -3.9x | ||
| vs XGBoost | +41.4% | +79.6% | -2.2x |
Notes: PR-AUC is prioritized for imbalance; F1@0.5 uses the optimal threshold. Unfilled cells indicate benchmarks in progress. Note on Pima Diabetes: Small datasets (n=460) have high variance due to limited samples. Results may not generalize; re-run with your data for confirmation. Note on Breast Cancer: PKBoost slightly underperforms on nearly balanced datasets (37% minority). This is expected—our optimizations target extreme imbalance. For balanced data, use XGBoost.
Credit Card Fraud (0.2% minority class):
Pattern: As imbalance severity increases (from balanced to 5% to 1% to 0.2%), traditional boosting drops linearly while PKBoost maintains high accuracy.
PKBoost features experimental drift detection that monitors model vulnerabilities and can trigger adaptive retraining.
Benchmark: After introducing a significant covariate shift (adding noise to 10 features), models were tested on corrupted data:
| Model | Baseline PR-AUC | After Drift | Degradation |
|---|---|---|---|
| PKBoost | 87.8% | 86.2% | 1.8% |
| LightGBM | 79.3% | 45.6% | 42.5% |
| XGBoost | 74.5% | 50.8% | 31.8% |
PKBoost's robustness comes from: - Conservative tree depth, which prevents overfitting to specific distributions - Quantile-based binning that adapts to feature dist
$ claude mcp add PkBoost \
-- python -m otcore.mcp_server <graph>