Class Array

Source/ThirdParty/NvCloth/ps/PsArray.h:61–638

*/
template <class T, class Alloc = typename AllocatorTraits<T>::Type>
class Array : protected Alloc
{
  public:
	typedef T* Iterator;
	typedef const T* ConstIterator;

	explicit Array(const physx::PxEMPTY v) : Alloc(v)
	{
		if(mData)
			mCapacity |= PX_SIGN_BITMASK;
	}

	/*!
	Default array constructor. Initialize an empty array
	*/
	PX_INLINE explicit Array(const Alloc& alloc = Alloc()) : Alloc(alloc), mData(0), mSize(0), mCapacity(0)
	{
	}

	/*!
	Initialize array with given capacity
	*/
	PX_INLINE explicit Array(uint32_t size, const T& a = T(), const Alloc& alloc = Alloc())
	: Alloc(alloc), mData(0), mSize(0), mCapacity(0)
	{
		resize(size, a);
	}

	/*!
	Copy-constructor. Copy all entries from other array
	*/
	template <class A>
	PX_INLINE explicit Array(const Array<T, A>& other, const Alloc& alloc = Alloc())
	: Alloc(alloc)
	{
		copy(other);
	}

	// This is necessary else the basic default copy constructor is used in the case of both arrays being of the same
	// template instance
	// The C++ standard clearly states that a template constructor is never a copy constructor [2]. In other words,
	// the presence of a template constructor does not suppress the implicit declaration of the copy constructor.
	// Also never make a copy constructor explicit, or copy-initialization* will no longer work. This is because
	// 'binding an rvalue to a const reference requires an accessible copy constructor' (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/)
	// *http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1051379/is-there-a-difference-in-c-between-copy-initialization-and-assignment-initializ
	PX_INLINE Array(const Array& other, const Alloc& alloc = Alloc()) : Alloc(alloc)
	{
		copy(other);
	}

	/*!
	Initialize array with given length
	*/
	PX_INLINE explicit Array(const T* first, const T* last, const Alloc& alloc = Alloc())
	: Alloc(alloc), mSize(last < first ? 0 : uint32_t(last - first)), mCapacity(mSize)
	{
		mData = allocate(mSize);
		copy(mData, mData + mSize, first);