| 997 | } |
| 998 | |
| 999 | bool MemPoolAccept::ReplacementChecks(Workspace& ws) |
| 1000 | { |
| 1001 | AssertLockHeld(cs_main); |
| 1002 | AssertLockHeld(m_pool.cs); |
| 1003 | |
| 1004 | const CTransaction& tx = *ws.m_ptx; |
| 1005 | const uint256& hash = ws.m_hash; |
| 1006 | TxValidationState& state = ws.m_state; |
| 1007 | |
| 1008 | CFeeRate newFeeRate(ws.m_modified_fees, ws.m_vsize); |
| 1009 | // The replacement transaction must have a higher feerate than its direct conflicts. |
| 1010 | // - The motivation for this check is to ensure that the replacement transaction is preferable for |
| 1011 | // block-inclusion, compared to what would be removed from the mempool. |
| 1012 | // - This logic predates ancestor feerate-based transaction selection, which is why it doesn't |
| 1013 | // consider feerates of descendants. |
| 1014 | // - Note: Ancestor feerate-based transaction selection has made this comparison insufficient to |
| 1015 | // guarantee that this is incentive-compatible for miners, because it is possible for a |
| 1016 | // descendant transaction of a direct conflict to pay a higher feerate than the transaction that |
| 1017 | // might replace them, under these rules. |
| 1018 | if (const auto err_string{PaysMoreThanConflicts(ws.m_iters_conflicting, newFeeRate, hash)}) { |
| 1019 | return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee", *err_string); |
| 1020 | } |
| 1021 | |
| 1022 | // Calculate all conflicting entries and enforce BIP125 Rule #5. |
| 1023 | if (const auto err_string{GetEntriesForConflicts(tx, m_pool, ws.m_iters_conflicting, ws.m_all_conflicting)}) { |
| 1024 | return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, |
| 1025 | "too many potential replacements", *err_string); |
| 1026 | } |
| 1027 | // Enforce BIP125 Rule #2. |
| 1028 | if (const auto err_string{HasNoNewUnconfirmed(tx, m_pool, ws.m_iters_conflicting)}) { |
| 1029 | return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, |
| 1030 | "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", *err_string); |
| 1031 | } |
| 1032 | // Check if it's economically rational to mine this transaction rather than the ones it |
| 1033 | // replaces and pays for its own relay fees. Enforce BIP125 Rules #3 and #4. |
| 1034 | for (CTxMemPool::txiter it : ws.m_all_conflicting) { |
| 1035 | ws.m_conflicting_fees += it->GetModifiedFee(); |
| 1036 | ws.m_conflicting_size += it->GetTxSize(); |
| 1037 | } |
| 1038 | if (const auto err_string{PaysForRBF(ws.m_conflicting_fees, ws.m_modified_fees, ws.m_vsize, |
| 1039 | ::incrementalRelayFee, hash)}) { |
| 1040 | return state.Invalid(TxValidationResult::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, "insufficient fee", *err_string); |
| 1041 | } |
| 1042 | return true; |
| 1043 | } |
| 1044 | |
| 1045 | bool MemPoolAccept::PackageMempoolChecks(const std::vector<CTransactionRef>& txns, |
| 1046 | PackageValidationState& package_state) |
nothing calls this directly
no test coverage detected