MCPcopy Create free account
hub / github.com/DeepRec-AI/DeepRec / testExplicitMarking

Method testExplicitMarking

tensorflow/compiler/tests/jit_test.py:239–277  ·  view source on GitHub ↗

Test explicit marking of operators to compile.

(self)

Source from the content-addressed store, hash-verified

237 self._compare(MnistForward, [w, b, x])
238
239 def testExplicitMarking(self):
240 """Test explicit marking of operators to compile."""
241 batch_size = 16
242 image_size = 28 * 28
243 num_classes = 10
244
245 with ops.Graph().as_default():
246 x = array_ops.placeholder(dtypes.float32)
247 w = array_ops.placeholder(dtypes.float32)
248 b = array_ops.placeholder(dtypes.float32)
249 with jit_scope():
250 y1 = math_ops.matmul(x, w)
251 y2 = math_ops.add(y1, b)
252 with jit_scope():
253 y = math_ops.square(y2)
254
255 dw = np.random.random_sample((image_size, num_classes)).astype(np.float32)
256 db = np.random.random_sample((num_classes)).astype(np.float32)
257 dx = np.random.random_sample((batch_size, image_size)).astype(np.float32)
258 with session_lib.Session() as sess:
259 run_metadata = config_pb2.RunMetadata()
260 output = test_utils.RunWithWarmup(
261 sess,
262 y, {
263 x: dx,
264 w: dw,
265 b: db
266 },
267 run_metadata=run_metadata,
268 options=config_pb2.RunOptions(
269 trace_level=config_pb2.RunOptions.FULL_TRACE))
270
271 # TODO(phawkins): really we would like to test that there were exactly
272 # two kernel launches. However, we have no reliable way to determine
273 # that.
274 self.assert_(MetadataHasXlaRunOp(run_metadata))
275
276 expected = np.square(np.dot(dx, dw) + db)
277 self.assertAllClose(expected, output, rtol=1e-1)
278
279
280class XlaCompilationTest(test.TestCase):

Callers

nothing calls this directly

Calls 10

MetadataHasXlaRunOpFunction · 0.85
RunMetadataMethod · 0.80
as_defaultMethod · 0.45
GraphMethod · 0.45
placeholderMethod · 0.45
matmulMethod · 0.45
addMethod · 0.45
squareMethod · 0.45
SessionMethod · 0.45
assertAllCloseMethod · 0.45

Tested by

no test coverage detected