| 139 | |
| 140 | |
| 141 | CStatus UThreadPool::destroy() { |
| 142 | CGRAPH_FUNCTION_BEGIN |
| 143 | if (!is_init_) { |
| 144 | CGRAPH_FUNCTION_END |
| 145 | } |
| 146 | |
| 147 | // primary 线程是普通指针,需要delete |
| 148 | for (const auto& pt : primary_threads_) { |
| 149 | CGRAPH_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(pt); |
| 150 | status += pt->destroy(); |
| 151 | } |
| 152 | CGRAPH_FUNCTION_CHECK_STATUS |
| 153 | |
| 154 | /** |
| 155 | * 这里之所以 destroy和 delete分开两个循环执行, |
| 156 | * 是因为当前线程被delete后,还可能存在未被delete的主线程,来steal当前线程的任务 |
| 157 | * 在windows环境下,可能出现问题。 |
| 158 | * destroy 和 delete 分开之后,不会出现此问题。 |
| 159 | * 感谢 Ryan大佬(https://github.com/ryanhuang) 提供的帮助 |
| 160 | */ |
| 161 | for (auto &pt : primary_threads_) { |
| 162 | CGRAPH_DELETE_PTR(pt) |
| 163 | } |
| 164 | primary_threads_.clear(); |
| 165 | |
| 166 | // secondary 线程是智能指针,不需要delete |
| 167 | task_queue_.reset(); |
| 168 | for (auto &st : secondary_threads_) { |
| 169 | CGRAPH_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(st.get()); |
| 170 | status += st->destroy(); |
| 171 | } |
| 172 | CGRAPH_FUNCTION_CHECK_STATUS |
| 173 | secondary_threads_.clear(); |
| 174 | thread_record_map_.clear(); |
| 175 | is_init_ = false; |
| 176 | |
| 177 | CGRAPH_FUNCTION_END |
| 178 | } |
| 179 | |
| 180 | |
| 181 | CBool UThreadPool::isInit() const { |
no test coverage detected