Method ConsiderEviction

src/net_processing.cpp:3116–3167

}

void PeerLogicValidation::ConsiderEviction(CNode *pto, int64_t time_in_seconds)
{
    AssertLockHeld(cs_main);

    CNodeState &state = *State(pto->GetId());
    const CNetMsgMaker msgMaker(pto->GetSendVersion());

    if (!state.m_chain_sync.m_protect && IsOutboundDisconnectionCandidate(pto) && state.fSyncStarted) {
        // This is an outbound peer subject to disconnection if they don't
        // announce a block with as much work as the current tip within
        // CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT + HEADERS_RESPONSE_TIME seconds (note: if
        // their chain has more work than ours, we should sync to it,
        // unless it's invalid, in which case we should find that out and
        // disconnect from them elsewhere).
        if (state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr && state.pindexBestKnownBlock->nChainWork >= chainActive.Tip()->nChainWork) {
            if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout != 0) {
                state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout = 0;
                state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header = nullptr;
                state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders = false;
            }
        } else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout == 0 || (state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr && state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr && state.pindexBestKnownBlock->nChainWork >= state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->nChainWork)) {
            // Our best block known by this peer is behind our tip, and we're either noticing
            // that for the first time, OR this peer was able to catch up to some earlier point
            // where we checked against our tip.
            // Either way, set a new timeout based on current tip.
            state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout = time_in_seconds + CHAIN_SYNC_TIMEOUT;
            state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header = chainActive.Tip();
            state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders = false;
        } else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout > 0 && time_in_seconds > state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout) {
            // No evidence yet that our peer has synced to a chain with work equal to that
            // of our tip, when we first detected it was behind. Send a single getheaders
            // message to give the peer a chance to update us.
            if (state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders) {
                // They've run out of time to catch up!
                LogPrintf("Disconnecting outbound peer %d for old chain, best known block = %s\n", pto->GetId(), state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr ? state.pindexBestKnownBlock->GetBlockHash().ToString() : "<none>");
                pto->fDisconnect = true;
            } else {
                assert(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header);
                LogPrint(BCLog::NET, "sending getheaders to outbound peer=%d to verify chain work (current best known block:%s, benchmark blockhash: %s)\n", pto->GetId(), state.pindexBestKnownBlock != nullptr ? state.pindexBestKnownBlock->GetBlockHash().ToString() : "<none>", state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString());
                connman->PushMessage(pto, msgMaker.Make(NetMsgType::GETHEADERS, chainActive.GetLocator(state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->pprev), uint256()));
                state.m_chain_sync.m_sent_getheaders = true;
                constexpr int64_t HEADERS_RESPONSE_TIME = 120; // 2 minutes
                // Bump the timeout to allow a response, which could clear the timeout
                // (if the response shows the peer has synced), reset the timeout (if
                // the peer syncs to the required work but not to our tip), or result
                // in disconnect (if we advance to the timeout and pindexBestKnownBlock
                // has not sufficiently progressed)
                state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout = time_in_seconds + HEADERS_RESPONSE_TIME;
            }
        }
    }
}

void PeerLogicValidation::EvictExtraOutboundPeers(int64_t time_in_seconds)
{